Ken Carlton, vice president of Corrugated Metals of Chicago,
doesn't pretend to be a web-savvy guy. "I'm down here bending
steel," he says. "I don't know anything about the Internet." For a
long while that was sort of the motto at Corrugated, a 116-year-old,
privately held maker of roll-form metal products for metal siding
and railcars. By April 2001 the website of the
$20-million-plus-a-year company had drawn exactly four sales in two
years. You can crow over four cars, four homes, four Emmys—but
unless you're selling aircraft carriers, four sales aren't going to
cut it. Carlton turned to a web designer who—for $42,000—revamped
the site and introduced him to a nifty marketing technique. Within a
year Corrugated averaged 20 new online customers a month, whose
orders have ranged from $500 to $3.5 million. Last year, in one of
the worst downturns the metal-manufacturing industry has ever faced,
Corrugated's sales rose 35%. Says Carlton: "I shudder to think what
our company would look like" without the new web-marketing plan.
The online technique that has paid off for Corrugated is known as
pay-for-performance search, or keyword bidding. Thousands of small
businesses have found it to be the most successful online marketing
technique ever for generating customer leads. Advertisers such as
Corrugated jockey for prime positioning in the listings of search
engines such as Google and Yahoo (which is a player through its
pending $1.63 billion acquisition of Overture Systems). By bidding
on keywords related to its business, a company can get its name—and
web address—in front of users searching using that term. The
advertiser pays only when someone becomes a sales lead by clicking
on its link.
A $1.1 billion market in 2002, keyword bidding is expected to hit
$1.6 billion this year and soar to $4.3 billion by 2008, according
to Jupiter Research, which would make search engines the new yellow
pages (see our companion story on the "new" old yellow pages,
following this article). Explaining the success of keyword bidding,
Gary Stein, a Jupiter senior analyst, says, "It's because consumers
have embraced search engines. They want to find something, they use
search engines immediately." In other words, this is a web marketing
tool—unlike banner ads and pop-ups—that won't annoy potential
customers.
Yet as paid listings become more crowded, they can become less
effective—and more expensive. A top position for a hypercompetitive
word like "mortgage" can run more than $10—for a mere click. Even
the less-sought-after keywords are rising in price. The average for
all keywords has gone from 30 cents in 2002, according to New York
City investment bank Kaufman Brothers, to an expected 38 cents this
year. When bids were low, advertisers didn't have to worry so much
about converting leads into sales. Companies are now refining the
way they bid, looking for the most likely prospects rather than just
more lead volume.
And keyword bidding is evolving into part of an overall strategy
using search engines as a lead generator. "Marketing on the Internet
isn't about finding one method that works; it's an all-around
process," says Mark Fiala, director of Internet operations for
California Breath Clinics in Los Angeles, maker of the TheraBreath
line of oral-care products. The $3 million business researched
better, cheaper keywords, routed leads to specific product pages
rather than the home page, and set up a way to solicit e-mail
addresses to turn lookers into buyers. It reduced its monthly
marketing tab from $8,000 to $4,000 while increasing its return on
investment to some 275%. Here's how Fiala and others are freshening
up customer lists and getting minty sales with search-engine
marketing.
Better Bidding
If a company is lucky, competitors in
its niche have not yet discovered keyword bidding. "This is not how
CPAs find clients," admits Stephen M. Rousso, 59, of Stephen M.
Rousso CPA & Associates, a two-accountant firm in Sherman Oaks,
Calif., who estimates that he gets $2,000 in new business each month
from the $40 to $75 he spends on keyword bidding. Because few CPAs
have discovered the technique, he can rank at or near the top for
keywords such as "business accountant" and "small-business
accountant" for 25 to 35 cents a pop.
Rousso, a CPA for 17 years, previously had little success
attracting customers through telemarketing. "It required a lot of
effort to woo and win clients," he says. His web efforts were doubly
disappointing until he revamped his site last December and started
keyword bidding. Soon after, Rousso was getting two to five contacts
a week from as far away as Japan and Europe. About 25% of the leads
Rousso gets via search are what he calls "looky loo," the crazies
who want to pick his brain for free. But because Rousso is paying
chump change to woo customers, he can endure some chumps—three of
ten leads become clients.
Most businesses, however, can't afford that looky loo, and
they're discovering that keyword bidding isn't figure skating: You
don't always need to be No. 1 in the rankings to take home the gold.
"We've found that as a general rule it's better to be No. 2 or 3,"
says David Kim, director of online marketing for Hotwire.com, a
travel website with $110 million in annual sales and 20,000 keywords
(at presstime it had agreed to be acquired by Barry Diller's
InterActive Corp. for $665 million). "First place can be a
nonefficient buy. You'll often get a lower conversion rate." That's
because users will impulsively click on the first link in the
listings without really asking whether it's what they want. So being
No. 1 means shelling out more for poorer-quality leads than the No.
2 or No. 3 bidder.
Determining which keywords are working has traditionally involved
a bit of guesswork. "Clicks can be misleading," says Renee
Silverman, director of marketing for Irv's Luggage Warehouse, which
with its sister businesses, Emporium Luggage and Executive
Essentials, makes up an 11-store chain headquartered in Arlington
Heights, Ill. In-store sales have been "soft for a long while," she
says, "but we're seeing steady growth online." Maintaining that
growth means knowing what's driving sales. Gradually search sites
are providing helpful tools. In August, Silverman downloaded a free
utility from Overture that tracks which clicks, from which keywords,
get the customers. "You really need it, or you're spending blindly,"
she says. After only a month she saw that the most likely sales come
from users who either type a specific phrase into a search engine,
such as a product name or niche, or type a broad term and then wade
through listings. Traffic from terms like "luggage" do not convert
well, while phrases like "Hartmann luggage" do. So Silverman lowered
her bids on the broad terms and focused on more specific, less
expensive keywords where it's cheaper to be No. 1 and the traffic is
more targeted. "We have less Overture traffic now, but more
qualified leads," she says.
Develop a Diversified Strategy
Keyword bidding is just
one way to reach customers through search engines—and not always the
best one. Timothy Heitmann, owner of Popcorn Palace in Chicago,
which sells $1 million worth of gourmet kernels annually in flavors
ranging from jalapeno to chocolate-fudge brownie, has experimented
with another search-engine marketing technique known as
optimization. This involves tailoring the layout, code, and language
on a website to make it appear higher in the "editorial" search
rankings determined by relevancy rather than bid price. (For
example, making sure the home page repeatedly uses desired keywords
in the title, headlines, links, and so forth.)
Heitmann founded Popcorn Palace with his brother Chris in 1995 as
a single store in Chicago's Navy Pier and expanded to mail order and
then the web in 1999. The Heitmanns spent a couple thousand
dollars—and a $200 monthly maintenance fee—to optimize their site
but were disappointed to find that their listings didn't always turn
up so high. "We'd be No. 3 or No. 4 on AOL for a while, then we'd
drop down to 20," says Timothy. While checking his ranking one day
in 2000, he noticed paid listings at the top of the page. The
Heitmanns investigated and started bidding on Overture, ultimately
using about 100 keywords. Through keyword bidding, Popcorn Palace
quickly landed several key corporate customers, including Fannie May
Candies (a $60,000 account in 2002) and FTD.com ($50,000). The
Heitmanns pulled the plug on optimization and put 90% of their
marketing budget into keyword bidding.
As the bids have gotten more expensive, from an average of 18
cents in 2000 to 44 cents last year, the Heitmanns' spending has
exploded, from $20,000 to $50,000, and it has been a struggle to
keep ROI steady at three to one. They have reached an upper limit on
what they can spend on keyword bidding and on how far they can grow
it. "We're going to go back to optimizing the site, in conjunction
with the searches," says Timothy, who is now seeking a consultant to
manage it all. (Unless it's what you want to do all day, you'll need
a consultant to do tailoring and monitoring. Examples include
MoreVisibility.com, based in Boca Raton, Fla., and Toronto's Page
Zero Media.) By diversifying its strategy, Popcorn Palace is hoping
to duplicate the experience of iCode, a developer of enterprise
software for small businesses that is based in Washington, D.C. It
generates $3.41 in sales for every $1 it spends on keyword bidding,
but its return from its search-engine-optimized site, whose code is
embedded with keywords for each of its software offerings, is almost
24 to one. Even so, "there's just so much you can do to boost your
ranking," says Steven Toole, the company's vice president of
marketing. "You've got to have both paid and nonpaid listings to get
your message across."
Lamps Plus, a 44-store, 29-year-old company based in Chatsworth,
Calif., has tried keyword bidding and optimization—along with every
other search-engine marketing technique. Angela Hsu, director of
Internet business development, has gotten great results adding
what's known as paid inclusion to her marketing mix. In this scheme
a company submits its web pages to a search engine to guarantee that
they get indexed, which is important because the typical search
engine normally includes just 30% of the web's pages. By paying
search engines like LookSmart a flat fee of 20 to 40 cents a lead,
Lamps Plus yields a lower total customer-acquisition cost than its
keyword bidding on Overture ($30 vs. $37). Better still, paid
inclusion requires less legwork. "You don't have to manage it on a
day-to-day basis, as you do with bidding," says Hsu.
What's Next
So far, small businesses have done a
remarkable job of adapting to the shifting landscape of keyword
bidding. But as more sites chase this proven revenue model—hello,
Microsoft!—more companies will bid, and prices will rise. It's like
going to an auction with your neighbor, who happens to be Ben
Affleck. "Gradually the smaller guys will be crowded out," says
Richard Fetyko, a Kaufman Brothers analyst. "They will turn to paid
inclusion and second-tier providers, like FindWhat.com, where they
can bid for less but will get less traffic."
Small businesses have a more optimistic outlook. "When bids go
up, conversion rates go down, so smart bidders will bid down," says
David Kim of Hotwire. "It's a self-regulating market." Emerging
technologies will create new opportunities, such as letting local
businesses pitch only to area customers and helping advertisers run
their ads in the proper context (a search for Paris Hilton paparazzi
photos doesn't signify hotel interest). But small businesses have to
be self-regulating too. As long as they embrace savvy bidding,
better tracking, and accountability for every dollar, they'll stay
in the picture—and the rankings.
Feedback? Write to fsb_mail@timeinc.com