Free Search Engine Visibility Report

Newsletter Sign Up

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

 

Free Resources

New MoreVisibility Webinars Complimentary Webinar
 
SEO: Google Mayday & Caffeine
 

Articles written in February, 2008

A New Robot Comes to Town: msnbot/1.1

February 14th, 2008 by Marjory Meechan

This week, MSN Live Search announced changes to their robot including a new name: msnbot/1.1. Currently, the name change just applies to their main robot, but look forward to more new robots from MSN in the coming months.

The new robot comes equipped with features designed to put less of a load on servers while still collecting the maximum number of new pages. Some of the new features include:

  • HTTP Compression: This lets the server download documents compressed with gzip or other formats to the search engine robot instead of the full documents. Because compressed documents are smaller, this reduces the amount of time it takes to access all the pages of a site.
  • Conditional Get: This feature allows the robot to check to see if the page has changed since the last time they were there and only download it if it has. Basically, the robot sends a request asking if the page has changed since the last date it was there and if not, it moves on.

These features are great because it means that their robot will waste less time looking at pages it already has and more time looking for new pages. This should result in more pages of a site being indexed – particularly in the case of large sites and less time spent crawling around websites using up bandwidth and putting extra pressure on servers.

This was good news for webmasters who have complained that MSN’s robot was taking up too much bandwidth while crawling their site, but the technology is not new to web hosts. The other search engines have been employing these methods for some time to reduce the load they place on web servers. Yahoo has supported both these technologies since 2005. Ask supports http compression and Google supports conditional get and other methods to reduce bandwidth already. This just shows that MSN is still playing catch-up with the other major search engines. Still, it’s welcome news and MSN has been kind enough to provide us with a tool to check if server settings support http compression and conditional get. For more information on this, just check out the Live Search blog and put out the welcome mat for msnbot/1.1.

Posted in SEO News, SEO & Technology

Have you tested your landing pages lately?

February 13th, 2008 by Heather Stanish

Search is becoming ever so popular, as we have seen a great migration from tradition media to internet search. The numbers are in and people have shifted their buying habits and research to the online medium in droves. There are an abundance of websites to choose from when conducting a search. Yes, we’ve said it many times, it is very important to have your Search Engine Optimization (SEO) strategy and your Search Engine Marketing (SEM) strategy in place to make sure you show up, but, if that’s all you do, you’ve only gotten your customer to your doorstep. What are you doing in order to get a prospect to then come in, take a look around, and feel excited and comfortable enough to actually buy something, or want more information about your product or service?

If you haven’t given thought to what prospects do once they get to your website, or if you are using analytics and aren’t sure why your bounce rate is so high, I would look at the obvious question… what pages are you sending your prospects to? I would then most certainly conduct testing of the landing pages your prospects arrive at on your site (or your doorstep). You want to make sure that your landing pages are attractive and give your prospects a clear call to action so that you aren’t missing your chance to show them what you have to offer!

Google AdWords has a very nice feature, called Website Optimizer and through this tool, you can very conveniently conduct a controlled test of your landing page’s effectiveness. Google Analytics has a great reporting functionality that works in conjunction with the Optimizer tool in order to run reporting and analyze which pages are performing better. What good is a test without analysis? You may be pleasantly surprised what you perceive is effective and what your prospects are actually reacting to! Since they are the ones that buy your product, let them help you determine what they want from you when they visit your site.

There are various approaches to testing landing pages, whether you decide to conduct an A/B comparison, or if you want to conduct a multivariate test in which you test various layouts of the same page. Whatever type of test you decide, do your research first. There are a multitude of articles that you can find that give advice. Make sure you plan ahead, test out pages that are popular enough to be visited (or your test will take an unreasonably long time to conduct), run the test long enough to capture adequate data, and of course, make necessary changes to the website.

Like anything else in marketing, conduct tests often, because buying habits and trends come and go. Conducting a test once satisfactorily doesn’t mean it will continue to be effective in the future.

Happy testing!

http://searchengineland.com/080123-075224.php

http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=3628090

Posted in SEO News, SEO & Technology, SEO & Design, SEO & Content

Design That Works With Your Website Objectives

February 12th, 2008 by Jordan Sandford

I would like to state the purpose of this post at the beginning: to urge people to start thinking more objectively and less emotionally about designing a website.

Some readers may find this information a good review of business logic and others may welcome my post as something valuable to start thinking about.

I often hear people use the words, ‘I like’ when speaking about a website. One of my design instructors at Florida Atlantic University would stop us in the middle of our sentences if we said ‘I like.’ We would have sessions in which we had to defend our work or others’ work, and using ‘I like’ just wouldn’t cut it for my instructor. For a few weeks, I would struggle with this, asking myself, ‘what’s wrong with having an opinion?’ I was so annoyed, as were most of my classmates, but I thought that I must not be seeing something.

So, what was my instructor’s objective? The idea is that design decisions should be based on as much research and evidence as can be obtained. Designing around your own emotions and preconceived ideas can misdirect and harm your efforts and negatively affect ROI. I finally understood.

Here’s a common scenario:
Client: Our website’s banner should be blue.
Design team: Why should it be blue?

Client: I like blue.
Design team: Why do you like blue?

Client: Blue has a sense of calmness.
Design team: (Tries to convince client that they might need to spend more time in researching what would work best for the client’s website.)

Client: (Client downplays suggestions in hopes of launching the site as soon as possible.)
Design team: OK. We are suggesting a side navigation for all your internal pages.

Client: We were thinking to use a top navigation with light text on a dark background (reverse type).
Design team: OK. Why is that?

Client: We surfed a few sites previously and were amazed at how soothing reverse type can make a web site. (Client provides a few reference sites.)
Design team: Yes, those sites do have a soothing sense about them. We believe these sites’ content makes them more soothing, rather than the reverse type.

Client: OK, well we like how the site’s use of reverse type adds to its attractiveness.

The client knew what their goals were for their site and may have even brought in market research to help define these goals, but they didn’t know quite how to get there.

Here’s another example: A site’s goal is to be a resource for teachers wanting to teach basic color theory to children.

Because the site is about color, there’s color everywhere, but it’s used ineffectively. The site includes the use of colors that clash when overlapped. Being primarily an education site, the educator (parent or otherwise) would probably be the first demographic that should be targeted by the design. However, what could easily end up happening is that these educators only remain on the site for a short period of time and quickly return to their Google search results page. Their use of color didn’t work for the site’s objectives.

Moral: After knowing what your site objectives are, use scientific research to attain your objectives. The nerds have done the testing for you, and you can use their results to employ efficient methods to realize your goals. It’s worth the effort.

Posted in SEO & Technology, SEO & Design

« Previous Entries Next Entries »


Subscribe rss feed Login or Register

Recent Articles

Article Categories

Articles by Month

Related Sites


Inc 5000 Google Analytics Authorized Consultant Google Qualified Company Yahoo Certified Ambassador Microsoft adExcellence Member Greenified 2009

MoreVisibility
925 South Federal Highway, Suite 750
Boca Raton, Florida 33432, USA

800.787.0497

ph: 561.620.9682

fx:  561.620.9684


© 1999 - 2010 MoreVisibility ® All Rights Reserved. Privacy | Legal

MoreVisibility Social Networking Links YouTube LinkedIn Facebook Twitter