Articles in The 'URL-canonicalization' Tag

April 3 2014

Advanced SEO: Strategies for Bridging the Gap Between Where You Are & Where You Want to Be

by Lauren Owens

With each year, internet marketing gets a little more complex – especially SEO. The strategies that worked a few years ago just won’t hack it in this highly competitive – and highly distracting – environment. But there are ways to help your brand come out on top – even if you’re in a competitive field. In this post, we’ll look at some of our favorite advanced strategies for getting found in the SERPs (Search Engine Result Pages) today.Read More

January 27 2014

Technical SEO Checklist: A High-Level Look at What Could be Wrong with Your Website

by Matt Crowley

During many optimization projects, webmasters like to focus on on-page considerations such as content, keyword targeting and density, but none of that matters if your website has technical issues that inhibit it from being seen by the search engines. In this post, we take a high-level approach to technical SEO to give you an idea of what you should focus on before you even think about optimizing your content.

Read More

July 2 2008

Filenames, host names and canonicalization, oh my!

by Jordan Sandford

It’s been a while since we’ve talked about URL canonicalization on our blog, so I’ll quickly review what it is and then talk about filename canonicalization and how it can affect your SEO endeavors.

Canonicalization is something done to your site to help ensure that content from one specific URL in your site does not show up under another URL. This is a type of a duplicate content issue. If the engines index more than one copy of some specific content, from separate, full URLs (those containing all necessary parts), they will be forced to divide the “strength” of that content between the URLs. That reduces the “strength” of all URLs involved and reduces the chance that one of your URLs will show up in a search results page for a given search term. Most of the time, the issue will arise when both and (and all other pages of the site) show the same exact contents.

Having un-canonical host names is one way that duplicate content can become a problem for your site: a search engine indexes content from your home page at and indexes the same exact content at While on the subject of un-canonical host names, you should also know that it is possible to have un-canonical protocols in your URLs. In a complete URL like, the “http” is known as the protocol. If search engines happen to index the same content from, you may have just stepped into a duplicate content issue due to un-canonical protocols.

Now let’s say you have a store (or any other web-based application) on your site that is accessed from Generally, your ecommerce program would be located in a folder on your server called ‘store’ (and usually, URLs of your store’s products are based on that URL: It’s quite possible that a search engine could index content at and at and count them as duplicate content. This could happen if another site links directly to one of those URLs and your site links to the other URL. This is an example of what I call a file name canonicalization issue.

Those are basically all the canonicalization issues you could encounter. However, often times, you’ll find a site that has a combination of canonicalization issues. For example, all of the following URLs are different, but will all have the same exact content:

Perhaps you’re wondering if there would be a duplicate content issue between the following two URLS:

The answer will most likely depend on whether ‘blog’ is an actual folder on your server or a file. (Your web server or blog, or any other web-based application may be setup in a way that does not require file extensions such as .html.) Most web servers (the software on the hosting company’s computer that waits for and then responds when someone asks for a web page on your site) work the same way in this situation. If ‘blog’ is an actual folder on the web server, then whenever someone asks for (without the trailing forward slash), the web server automatically 301 redirects to (This is the correct redirect type for this situation, by the way, and this is the reason that this should not cause a duplicate content issue.) If someone asks for (with the trailing forward slash), the web server doesn’t redirect at all. I’ll talk more about this in my next post.

Marjory Meechan, in her blog How to Resolve the Canonicalization Issue without Access to your Server, discussed un-canonical host name issues and one way that can be used to fix this. Please read my next post in which I discuss the causes of these canonicalization issues and suggest more dependable methods to eliminate them, provided that you have some level of server access.

© 2024 MoreVisibility. All rights reserved.